torontosun.com

It’s based on the real-life friendship between journalist Tom Junod, who was commissioned to write a profile on the famous TV star Fred Rogers for Esquire and the film follows the amazing friendship that blossoms between the two. Rogers wore his signature red cardigan but, according to poshmark.com, “after his mother could no longer knit his cardigans, the low-cost production team procured zip-up cardigans from the same company that supplied them to the USPS and dyed them vivid colours in a soup pot. ” Carter’s famous cardigan is now on display at the Jimmy Carter Presidential Library in Atlanta, Ga., while, according to People magazine, Cobain’s was recently auctioned for an astonishing and record-breaking $334,000. According to Poshmark, searches for cardigans by men increased 79% since the movie premiered, while purchases of men’s cardigans have increased by 108% — and purchases of men’s red cardigans has increased by 104%!

There’s a famous flashback scene in the old Woody Allen movie Annie Hall where the main character’s mother takes her son to the doctor. On Friday, many thousands of Canadian school children will be exposed to similar rhetoric that may frighten them and cause them undue stress as they attend the various Global Climate Strike rallies taking part across the country. On Wednesday a man from Manchester, England, posted on social media that a 14-year-old boy from the school his wife works at committed suicide in part because of climate change anxiety. Climate Justice Toronto – one of the groups leading Friday’s Toronto march – posted on social media about all of the signs they’re building to wave during the supposedly child-friendly rally.

When the news first broke that Justin Trudeau had cavorted in blackface back in 2001 it was the incredible hypocrisy of the whole thing that likely struck most people as the big problem. Here’s a man who has spent the past four years using the highest office in the land to tsk-tsk Canada as an intolerant place – one that can only be salvaged by his own white knight feminism and commitment to diversity – when we learn that he was merely projecting, that his hectoring was all just an exercise in psychoanalysis to make him feel better for his past sins. The pictures and video we’ve seen aren’t those of someone who quickly tossed on a bit of face paint as some sort of last minute poor decision. The arguments in Trudeau’s favour have become so bizarre and such a reach that it wouldn’t be a stretch to see something arise that says, for example, that Andrew Scheer’s a bigger racist than Trudeau because he hasn’t worn blackface and therefore hasn’t had the same opportunities to learn from his mistakes as Trudeau.

The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF), a non-partisan charity, states in documents prepared for the Ontario Superior Court that the government’s new election laws violates the Charter rights of Canadians who wish to voice their opinions in the current election campaign. The new law now bans both false statements claiming “a candidate, a prospective candidate, the leader of a political party or a public figure associated with a political party” have committed an offence or been charged with committing an offence and also bans “a false statement about the citizenship, place of birth, education, professional qualifications or membership in a group or association of a candidate, a prospective candidate, the leader of a political party or a public figure associated with a political party. This year, partly out of a fear of the consequence of the amendments to s. 91, we have decided not to purchase Facebook advertisements on federal issues, and have ceased a campaign and disabled a website that focused on politicians that have broken promises to the public,” Wudrick writes, concerning how Sec. Cory Morgan, an outspoken political commentator and activist from Alberta, adds in an affidavit that he fears his social media arguments about how Justin Trudeau has broken the law and that the former Albert NDP government was colluding with trade unions – which he considers free speech statements – could see him prosecuted under Sec.