Many trial sites fail to meet enrollment needs required to conduct trials
In drug development, the term “endpoints” means the desired outcome of a therapy approved by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Sadly, over the last 30 years there has been just 4 approved drugs and 1 approved device to treat brain tumors, and these therapies have made just minor impacts on our OS.
So what if the FDA approved therapies (drugs and devices) based on different endpoints, and not on OS?
* PFS = progression free survival (the time between the first round of treatment and recurrence)
* QOL = quality of life, and if the treatment that has a positive impact on other aspects of our disease, for example seizure control or a decrease in neuro-toxicity (the bad stuff treatment does to our brains)
Endpoints are interesting, but designing new endpoints still does not provide a solution to the problems outlined at the start: low trial enrollment.