The plaintiffs argue that Germany’s purported provision of counterterrorism intelligence, as well as the usage rights it grants for Ramstein Air Base, a U. S. military facility located on German soil (in Rhineland-Palatinate), constitute direct support for U.S. drone operations.
The complaint alleges that “Germany is violating its constitutional and human rights obligation to protect because it has, thus far, not taken appropriate measures to prevent the U.S. from using its bases and facilities on German territory for drone attacks.
In March 2019 the Higher Administrative Court of Münster ruled on appeal that the German government must take measures to ensure that any U.S. operations that involve the Ramstein facility must fully comply with international law.
However, the court upheld the portion of the Cologne ruling that the judicial branch could not compel the government to ban support for U.S. operations outright.